{"id":28961,"date":"2021-06-28T04:10:05","date_gmt":"2021-06-28T04:10:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/qa.security.org\/?post_type=resources&#038;p=28961"},"modified":"2024-09-25T10:07:30","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T18:07:30","slug":"cybercrime-in-the-u-s","status":"publish","type":"resources","link":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/","title":{"rendered":"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Statistics about violent crimes, like robbery and murder, and property crimes, like theft and arson, are well-covered across the media landscape. But there\u2019s another type of crime that can be devastating \u2014 cybercrime.<\/p>\n<p>Data on crimes like identity theft, fraud, <a href=\"\/resources\/something-smells-phishy\/\">phishing<\/a>, and other cybercrimes is less well-known than other crimes. But reports from multiple federal sources indicate that these incidents are on the rise and surged during the pandemic.<\/p>\n<p>For example, cybercrime losses reported to the FBI\u2019s internet crime center in 2020 surpassed $4 billion, while incidents rose 69 percent from the previous year. Meanwhile, <a href=\"\/identity-theft\/\">identity theft<\/a> and fraud complaints to the Federal Trade Commission also climbed. This includes one specific type \u2013 government benefit ID theft \u2013 that exploded by almost 3,000 percent. This increase was likely connected to programs aimed to reduce the economic impact of the pandemic, such as expanded unemployment insurance.<\/p>\n<div class=\"page-tip fyi\">\n  \n  <div class=\"tip-icon\">\n    \n    <span class=\"icn\"><\/span>\n    \n  <\/div>\n  \n  <div class=\"copy\">\n    \n    <p><strong>FYI:<\/strong> There are steps you can take to reduce your risk of falling victim to these types of cybercrime. Read our <a href=\"\/digital-safety\/\">Guide to Personal Digital Security & Online Safety<\/a> for actionable advice on securing your online data.<\/p>\n    \n  <\/div>\n  \n<\/div>\n\n<h3>Key Findings<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime, <a href=\"\/identity-theft\/best\/\">ID theft<\/a>, and fraud complaints all hit five-year highs in 2020.<\/li>\n<li>Fraud and identity theft complaints up 45%, while cybercrime is up almost 70%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-28968 size-full\" title=\"Computer Devices\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7861.png\" alt=\"Computer Devices\" width=\"359\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7861.png 359w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7861-300x188.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 359px) 100vw, 359px\" \/><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>ID theft related to government benefits exploded in 2020, but other types of ID theft climbed as well, including tax (225 percent) and business loan (127 percent).<\/li>\n<li>Cybercrime related to compromised email accounts, including business accounts, was the costliest on average, at more than $90,000 per incident.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"text-center\"><b><a href=\"#stand\">Want to see data and rankings for your state? Click here.<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n<h2><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-29045 size-full\" title=\"Hand icon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7861-1.png\" alt=\"Hand icon\" width=\"130\" height=\"119\" \/>Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"two-col\">\n<li><a href=\"#national\">National Rates of Cybercrime, Fraud, & Identity Theft<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#state\">State Rates of Cybercrime, Fraud, & Identity Theft<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#stand\">Where Does Your State Stand?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"national\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28967 size-full\" title=\"Password icon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7863.png\" alt=\"Password icon\" width=\"130\" height=\"119\" \/><strong>National Rates of<\/strong> Cybercrime, Fraud & Identity Theft<\/h2>\n<p>Individuals and organizations struck by cybercrime and other modern theft tools have a couple of avenues for recourse, including law enforcement and non-law enforcement. Our analysis covers data the FBI\u2019s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) reported as well as data the Federal Trade Commission\u2019s Consumer Sentinel Network reported. It\u2019s important to note that the FTC is not a law enforcement agency, though in many cases, the agency does refer incidents to the FBI and state and local police agencies.<\/p>\n<p>The upshot of that is that our analysis, while it includes robust publicly available data, almost certainly underestimates cybercrime. Many people who are defrauded by phishing scams, ID theft, and other types of cybercrime feel ashamed and don\u2019t want to go through the hassle of reporting what happened to them. The FBI estimates that only about 15 percent of cybercrime gets reported.<\/p>\n<p>What we do know is that 2020 marked a huge increase in cybercrime and fraud, due largely to the pandemic. But even before COVID-19, complaints to both IC3 and the FTC were on the rise. Complaints to both agencies saw a huge uptick in 2020 (69 percent for IC3 and 45 percent for the FTC), but each had seen at least three straight years of increases before that.<\/p>\n<div class=\"page-tip did-you-know\">\n  \n  <div class=\"tip-icon\">\n    \n    <span class=\"icn\"><\/span>\n    \n  <\/div>\n  \n  <div class=\"copy\">\n    \n    <p><strong>Did You Know:<\/strong> Since the pandemic, the trend of increasing cybercrime has only increased. Although the number of complaints to the IC3 remained relatively steady since 2020, the damage caused by cybercrime continues to grow year after year. In 2021, the IC3 reported nearly $7 billion in damages with 2022 seeing over $10 billion in damages.<\/p>\n    \n  <\/div>\n  \n<\/div>\n\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28971 size-full\" title=\"IC3 and FTC complaints by year\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7870.png\" alt=\"IC3 and FTC complaints by year\" width=\"906\" height=\"391\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7870.png 906w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7870-300x129.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7870-768x331.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 906px) 100vw, 906px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Of the 30-plus categories of cybercrime for which the FBI reported data, phishing and related scams were by far the most common in 2020. These types of incidents accounted for almost one in three cybercrimes reported to the FBI.<\/p>\n<p>However, while they\u2019re incredibly common, phishing attacks are less lucrative for scammers on average than some other types of cybercrime. In fact, the average phishing scam generated only $225 compared to nearly $100,000 for attacks that compromised a business email account.<\/p>\n<p>These data points clearly show that cybercriminals pursue scams that are worth the time. Phishing attacks are really easy for criminals to run. They can easily send out an email to thousands or even millions of potential victims. But, the success rate is pretty low. Compromising a business email account, on the other hand, takes a significant amount of effort from a criminal. So, they only pursue business email accounts that could offer them a serious reward.<\/p>\n<p>You can use this information by recognizing that you don\u2019t need to make your data impossible to get. Instead, you only need to make it too difficult for it to be worth the time of a scammer.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&gt;&gt; Read More:<\/strong> <a href=\"\/digital-safety\/accessibility-guide\/\">The Complete Guide to Accessibility and Digital Security<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28963 size-full\" title=\"Cybercrime category by average value, 2020\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7871.png\" alt=\"Cybercrime category by average value, 2020\" width=\"905\" height=\"1300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7871.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7871-209x300.png 209w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7871-713x1024.png 713w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7871-768x1103.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7871-439x630.png 439w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>As phishing scams have become more common, rising nearly twelve-fold since 2016, they have actually become less valuable. The average phishing scam in 2016 managed to defraud its victim of more than $1,600. But while phishing scams have risen by an eye-popping percentage, tech support-related cybercrimes have seen the biggest surge over the past half-decade. They rose from just under 300 in 2016 to more than 15,000 in 2020.<\/p>\n<p>Complaints made to the FTC over fraud, identity theft, and other consumer complaints neared five million in 2020, jumping by more than 40 percent over 2020 and rising by more than half over the past half-decade. ID theft accounted for about 29 percent of all complaints to the FTC in 2020, while the 25-plus categories of consumer fraud accounted for nearly half of reports to the agency.<\/p>\n<p>In 2020, about 15 percent of ID theft cases reported to the FTC included more than one type, and all but one ID theft category saw numbers of cases rise during the pandemic, led by government benefit ID theft reports, which climbed by nearly 3,000 percent. Several others saw huge increases as well, including tax (225 percent), business loan (127 percent), and new bank accounts (87 percent). The only type of ID theft to become less common during the pandemic was ID theft for the purpose of evading the law.<\/p>\n<p>How do people fall victim to cybercriminals, fraudsters, and others? The FTC\u2019s 2020 report found that phone calls were the most common vector among fraud incidents where consumers reported the contact method. Text messages were the second most common, while online advertisements were the least likely way for fraudsters to procure their victims.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28974 size-full\" title=\"FTC fraud reports by contact method, number and median loss\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7872.png\" alt=\"FTC fraud reports by contact method, number and median loss\" width=\"905\" height=\"585\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7872.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7872-300x194.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7872-768x496.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In data from both the FBI and FTC, older people account for a large percentage of those who fall victim to cybercrimes. People over 60 accounted for about 23 percent of cybercrime victims whose age was known, and they accounted for 29 percent of fraud complainants to the FTC\u2019s database. However, they accounted for only about 15 percent of <a href=\"\/identity-theft\/stolen-identity\/\">ID theft victims<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28981 size-full\" title=\"Average cybercrime and fraud loss by age group\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7873.png\" alt=\"Average cybercrime and fraud loss by age group\" width=\"973\" height=\"718\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7873.png 973w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7873-300x221.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7873-768x567.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7873-854x630.png 854w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 973px) 100vw, 973px\" \/><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"state\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28966 size-full\" title=\"ID icon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7864.png\" alt=\"ID icon\" width=\"130\" height=\"119\" \/><strong>State Rates of<\/strong> Cybercrime, Fraud & Identity Theft<\/h2>\n<p>No state gets great marks when it comes to cybercrime, fraud, and identity theft, though rates and average losses vary pretty dramatically. Still, there are a handful of states that have consistently high rates of cybercrime.<\/p>\n<p>Colorado fared worst overall, appearing in the top 10 for per-capita cybercrime rates and average losses, per-capita fraud reports, and per-capita identity theft reports. The state was also in the top 15 for median loss due to fraud and recent changes in overall fraud reports and government benefit-related fraud reports. Several other states have consistently high rates of cybercrimes and related statistics, including Alaska, California, D.C., Florida, Maryland, Nevada, and Virginia.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, several states tend to have lower-than-average cybercrime rates, including Alabama, Idaho, Kentucky, Maine, and Nebraska. Let\u2019s take a closer look at the top and bottom states in a handful of statistical categories before diving into each state\u2019s cybercrime status.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28976 size-full\" title=\"Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7874.png\" alt=\"Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population\" width=\"905\" height=\"624\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7874.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7874-300x207.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7874-768x530.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28969 size-full\" title=\"Average cybercrime loss per victim\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7875.png\" alt=\"Average cybercrime loss per victim\" width=\"905\" height=\"652\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7875.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7875-300x216.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7875-768x553.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7875-874x630.png 874w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28975 size-full\" title=\"Fraud reports per 100,000 people\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7876.png\" alt=\"Fraud reports per 100,000 people\" width=\"905\" height=\"650\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7876.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7876-300x215.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7876-768x552.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7876-877x630.png 877w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28970 size-full\" title=\"Median fraud loss per victim\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7877.png\" alt=\"Median fraud loss per victim\" width=\"905\" height=\"652\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7877.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7877-300x216.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7877-768x553.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7877-874x630.png 874w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28972 size-full\" title=\"digital security in america\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7865.png\" alt=\"digital security in america\" width=\"762\" height=\"353\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7865.png 762w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7865-300x139.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 762px) 100vw, 762px\" \/><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28978 size-full\" title=\"ID thefts per 100,000 people\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7878.png\" alt=\"ID thefts per 100,000 people\" width=\"905\" height=\"650\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7878.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7878-300x215.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7878-768x552.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7878-877x630.png 877w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28979 size-full\" title=\"Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7880.png\" alt=\"Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020\" width=\"905\" height=\"652\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7880.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7880-300x216.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7880-768x553.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7880-874x630.png 874w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-28980 size-full\" title=\"Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7879.png\" alt=\"Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020\" width=\"905\" height=\"650\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7879.png 905w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7879-300x215.png 300w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7879-768x552.png 768w, https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7879-877x630.png 877w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 905px) 100vw, 905px\" \/><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"stand\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28973 size-full\" title=\"alert icon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7866.png\" alt=\"alert icon\" width=\"130\" height=\"119\" \/> <strong>Where Does<\/strong> Your State Stand?<\/h2>\n<p>Check out the cybercrime, fraud, and identity theft statistics in your state:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th colspan=\"3\"><strong style=\"display: inline-block; position: relative; top: -10px; left: 5px; font-size: 110%;\">Click on each state<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Alabama <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Kentucky <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">North Dakota <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Alaska <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Louisiana <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Ohio <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Arizona <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Maine <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Oklahoma <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Arkansas <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Maryland <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Oregon <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">California <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Massachusetts <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Pennsylvania <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Colorado <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Michigan <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Rhode Island <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Connecticut <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Minnesota <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">South Carolina <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Delaware <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Mississippi <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">South Dakota <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">District of Columbia<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Missouri <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Tennessee <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Florida <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Montana <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Texas <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Georgia <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Nebraska <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Utah <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Hawaii <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Nevada <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Vermont <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Idaho <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">New Hampshire <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Virginia <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Illinois <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">New Jersey <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Washington <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Indiana <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">New Mexico <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">West Virginia <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Iowa <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">New York <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Wisconsin <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Kansas <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">North Carolina <\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"#states\">Wyoming <\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div id=\"states\"><\/div>\n<div id=\"Alabama\" class=\"state\" style=\"display: block;\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Alabama<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 118, #42<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,747, #33<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 446, #44<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $280, #32<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 836, #16<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 17%, #49<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 474%, #38<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>194<\/td>\n<td>$851<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>724<\/td>\n<td>$2,645<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>887<\/td>\n<td>$1,568<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>907<\/td>\n<td>$5,601<\/td>\n<td>18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>848<\/td>\n<td>$5,349<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,040<\/td>\n<td>$7,561<\/td>\n<td>29%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Alaska\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Alaska<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 283, #4<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $3,542, #44<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 578, #11<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $500, #1<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 734, #30<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 51%, #1<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 653%, #28<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>66<\/td>\n<td>$1,165<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>214<\/td>\n<td>$2,336<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>192<\/td>\n<td>$5,946<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>240<\/td>\n<td>$4,081<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>469<\/td>\n<td>$1,920<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>563<\/td>\n<td>$4,550<\/td>\n<td>35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Arizona\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Arizona<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 179, #11<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,545, #25<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 581, #10<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $374, #10<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 869, #11<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 27%, #37<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 2,263%, #12<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>412<\/td>\n<td>$5,217<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,371<\/td>\n<td>$2,775<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,869<\/td>\n<td>$4,410<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,800<\/td>\n<td>$7,738<\/td>\n<td>19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,794<\/td>\n<td>$4,656<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>3,053<\/td>\n<td>$8,856<\/td>\n<td>37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Arkansas\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Arkansas<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 140, #28<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,100, #43<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 404, #47<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $296, #26<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 813, #20<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 19%, #47<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 4,232%, #7<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>104<\/td>\n<td>$758<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>335<\/td>\n<td>$1,564<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>511<\/td>\n<td>$8,235<\/td>\n<td>24%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,557<\/td>\n<td>$1,626<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>478<\/td>\n<td>$11,088<\/td>\n<td>31%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>636<\/td>\n<td>$5,499<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"California\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in California<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 176, #13<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $8,936, #6<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 513, #25<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $407, #3<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 807, #21<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 29%, #29<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 337%, #45<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>2,261<\/td>\n<td>$3,474<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>9,082<\/td>\n<td>$3,780<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>11,120<\/td>\n<td>$8,226<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>11,736<\/td>\n<td>$6,896<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>9,530<\/td>\n<td>$13,247<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>12,534<\/td>\n<td>$12,178<\/td>\n<td>25%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Colorado\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Colorado<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 214, #9<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $8,167, #10<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 615, #8<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $360, #12<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 874, #9<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 34%, #14<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 3,797%, #8<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>284<\/td>\n<td>$2,994<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,116<\/td>\n<td>$2,200<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,555<\/td>\n<td>$11,485<\/td>\n<td>18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,544<\/td>\n<td>$12,479<\/td>\n<td>19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,521<\/td>\n<td>$13,076<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>4,335<\/td>\n<td>$4,810<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Connecticut\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Connecticut<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 158, #21<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $7,330, #15<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 524, #19<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $286, #29<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 797, #23<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 31%, #21<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 578%, #29<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>171<\/td>\n<td>$1,823<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>561<\/td>\n<td>$2,958<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>700<\/td>\n<td>$3,276<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,097<\/td>\n<td>$4,565<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>768<\/td>\n<td>$20,388<\/td>\n<td>38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,057<\/td>\n<td>$10,071<\/td>\n<td>26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Delaware\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Delaware<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 229, #7<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $2,909, #45<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 683, #3<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $400, #4<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 1,127, #3<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 29%, #24<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 435%, #41<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>71<\/td>\n<td>$767<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>279<\/td>\n<td>$1,804<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>244<\/td>\n<td>$1,569<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>223<\/td>\n<td>$3,486<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>204<\/td>\n<td>$5,377<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>371<\/td>\n<td>$6,135<\/td>\n<td>35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"District-of-Columbia\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in District of Columbia<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 302, #2<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $8,885, #7<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 802, #1<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $399, #7<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 1,329, #1<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 24%, #41<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 242%, #50<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>50<\/td>\n<td>$26,103<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>242<\/td>\n<td>$3,718<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>328<\/td>\n<td>$4,076<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>253<\/td>\n<td>$12,734<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>244<\/td>\n<td>$9,927<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>252<\/td>\n<td>$20,384<\/td>\n<td>27%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Florida\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Florida<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 250, #5<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,485, #27<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 615, #9<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $384, #8<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 1,123, #4<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 35%, #10<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 208%, #51<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>6,614<\/td>\n<td>$769<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>4,760<\/td>\n<td>$2,489<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>7,168<\/td>\n<td>$4,784<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>8,204<\/td>\n<td>$7,318<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>8,983<\/td>\n<td>$5,235<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>9,252<\/td>\n<td>$9,149<\/td>\n<td>29%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Georgia\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Georgia<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 126, #34<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $7,369, #14<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 524, #17<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $300, #20<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 1,011, #6<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 37%, #8<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 304%, #46<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>438<\/td>\n<td>$3,726<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,464<\/td>\n<td>$2,283<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>2,066<\/td>\n<td>$6,892<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,949<\/td>\n<td>$8,442<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,844<\/td>\n<td>$10,931<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,145<\/td>\n<td>$12,028<\/td>\n<td>26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Hawaii\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Hawaii<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 140, #29<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $6,912, #18<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 520, #21<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $370, #11<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 707, #34<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 50%, #2<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 3,316%, #10<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>53<\/td>\n<td>$15,637<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>182<\/td>\n<td>$1,646<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>280<\/td>\n<td>$1,813<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>255<\/td>\n<td>$5,516<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>307<\/td>\n<td>$7,235<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>452<\/td>\n<td>$12,027<\/td>\n<td>40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Idaho\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Idaho<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 124, #38<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,283, #29<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 462, #40<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $295, #27<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 635, #45<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 21%, #45<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 896%, #26<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>110<\/td>\n<td>$5,325<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>253<\/td>\n<td>$1,167<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>336<\/td>\n<td>$4,127<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>296<\/td>\n<td>$6,321<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>295<\/td>\n<td>$1,997<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>550<\/td>\n<td>$8,364<\/td>\n<td>39%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Illinois\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Illinois<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 159, #19<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $7,456, #12<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 487, #34<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $285, #30<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 806, #22<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 33%, #16<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 10,801%, #3<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>498<\/td>\n<td>$3,188<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,907<\/td>\n<td>$2,624<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>2,325<\/td>\n<td>$9,257<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>3,038<\/td>\n<td>$3,797<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>3,993<\/td>\n<td>$10,647<\/td>\n<td>28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>4,227<\/td>\n<td>$7,604<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Indiana\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Indiana<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 190, #10<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $2,751, #47<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 454, #43<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $240, #43<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 660, #42<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 29%, #26<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 2,020%, #14<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>255<\/td>\n<td>$969<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>861<\/td>\n<td>$1,216<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>5,034<\/td>\n<td>$454<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>2,183<\/td>\n<td>$3,951<\/td>\n<td>25%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,197<\/td>\n<td>$4,182<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,519<\/td>\n<td>$6,616<\/td>\n<td>29%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Iowa\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Iowa<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 297, #3<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $2,284, #50<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 394, #49<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $250, #39<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 524, #49<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 13%, #51<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 528%, #33<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>125<\/td>\n<td>$814<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>6,954<\/td>\n<td>$58<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>406<\/td>\n<td>$1,884<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>397<\/td>\n<td>$5,663<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>373<\/td>\n<td>$12,274<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>570<\/td>\n<td>$7,168<\/td>\n<td>19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Kansas\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Kansas<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 119, #41<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,542, #26<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 478, #35<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $250, #39<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 729, #32<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 23%, #42<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 33,236%, #1<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>107<\/td>\n<td>$2,163<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>352<\/td>\n<td>$2,542<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>487<\/td>\n<td>$3,213<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>526<\/td>\n<td>$8,679<\/td>\n<td>24%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>546<\/td>\n<td>$3,357<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>728<\/td>\n<td>$10,048<\/td>\n<td>38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Kentucky\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Kentucky<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 153, #24<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $1,848, #51<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 466, #38<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $210, #50<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 658, #43<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 27%, #36<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 442%, #40<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>184<\/td>\n<td>$1,949<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>511<\/td>\n<td>$1,012<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>697<\/td>\n<td>$3,343<\/td>\n<td>19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>744<\/td>\n<td>$2,542<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>600<\/td>\n<td>$4,481<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>782<\/td>\n<td>$5,187<\/td>\n<td>32%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Louisiana\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Louisiana<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 109, #47<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,263, #30<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 404, #48<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $300, #20<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 732, #31<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 30%, #23<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 460%, #39<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>118<\/td>\n<td>$13,147<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>557<\/td>\n<td>$1,257<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>836<\/td>\n<td>$3,070<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>791<\/td>\n<td>$4,356<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>889<\/td>\n<td>$11,173<\/td>\n<td>37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>855<\/td>\n<td>$6,850<\/td>\n<td>22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Maine\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Maine<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 124, #37<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,230, #39<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 464, #39<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $211, #49<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 639, #44<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 23%, #43<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 6,053%, #6<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>47<\/td>\n<td>$6,345<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>163<\/td>\n<td>$482<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>248<\/td>\n<td>$2,799<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>211<\/td>\n<td>$3,349<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>263<\/td>\n<td>$6,814<\/td>\n<td>25%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>368<\/td>\n<td>$6,717<\/td>\n<td>35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Maryland\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Maryland<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 245, #6<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,220, #40<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 665, #4<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $329, #15<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 1,044, #5<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 42%, #6<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 528%, #34<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>323<\/td>\n<td>$5,373<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,104<\/td>\n<td>$2,268<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,469<\/td>\n<td>$3,439<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,458<\/td>\n<td>$8,262<\/td>\n<td>19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,636<\/td>\n<td>$8,152<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,067<\/td>\n<td>$10,246<\/td>\n<td>34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Massachusetts\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Massachusetts<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 166, #15<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $8,509 , #9<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 494, #31<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $275, #33<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 771, #25<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 28%, #31<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 9,996%, #4<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>323<\/td>\n<td>$3,914<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,281<\/td>\n<td>$2,466<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,424<\/td>\n<td>$6,935<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,748<\/td>\n<td>$8,618<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,847<\/td>\n<td>$9,660<\/td>\n<td>18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,309<\/td>\n<td>$8,855<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Michigan\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Michigan<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 125, #35<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $6,709, #19<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 497, #29<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $250, #39<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 714, #33<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 36%, #9<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,134%, #23<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>420<\/td>\n<td>$4,132<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,375<\/td>\n<td>$1,579<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,716<\/td>\n<td>$15,038<\/td>\n<td>31%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,815<\/td>\n<td>$4,705<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,928<\/td>\n<td>$7,395<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,499<\/td>\n<td>$7,541<\/td>\n<td>22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Minnesota\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Minnesota<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 121, #39<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $8,521, #8<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 505, #27<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $300, #20<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 691, #37<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 30%, #22<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,198%, #18<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>218<\/td>\n<td>$1,333<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>719<\/td>\n<td>$1,518<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>965<\/td>\n<td>$3,849<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,010<\/td>\n<td>$5,396<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,063<\/td>\n<td>$6,004<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,542<\/td>\n<td>$10,201<\/td>\n<td>27%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Mississippi\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Mississippi<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 83, #51<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $7,309, #16<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 408, #46<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $213, #48<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 662, #41<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 27%, #34<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 510%, #36<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>67<\/td>\n<td>$483<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>293<\/td>\n<td>$1,746<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>437<\/td>\n<td>$4,697<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>452<\/td>\n<td>$3,867<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>332<\/td>\n<td>$2,484<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>461<\/td>\n<td>$4,802<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Missouri\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Missouri<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 133, #32<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $14,205, #2<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 516, #23<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $236, #44<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 790, #24<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 27%, #35<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 476%, #37<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>195<\/td>\n<td>$16,433<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>753<\/td>\n<td>$3,716<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,427<\/td>\n<td>$2,611<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,171<\/td>\n<td>$59,268<\/td>\n<td>60%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,104<\/td>\n<td>$7,473<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,578<\/td>\n<td>$10,289<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Montana\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Montana<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 128, #33<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,153, #41<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 513, #26<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $299, #24<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 668, #39<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 19%, #48<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 2,215%, #13<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>41<\/td>\n<td>$656<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>140<\/td>\n<td>$1,705<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>160<\/td>\n<td>$1,256<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>194<\/td>\n<td>$1,206<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>178<\/td>\n<td>$1,586<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>335<\/td>\n<td>$12,334<\/td>\n<td>73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Nebraska\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Nebraska<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 112, #46<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,448, #28<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 455, #41<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $263, #36<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 603, #47<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 28%, #32<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 576%, #30<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>65<\/td>\n<td>$761<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>249<\/td>\n<td>$1,064<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>319<\/td>\n<td>$3,526<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>364<\/td>\n<td>$2,027<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>311<\/td>\n<td>$3,812<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>404<\/td>\n<td>$10,021<\/td>\n<td>34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Nevada\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Nevada<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 523, #1<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $2,755, #46<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 685, #2<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $400, #4<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 1,154, #2<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 26%, #38<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 3,607%, #9<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>356<\/td>\n<td>$1,267<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,258<\/td>\n<td>$1,619<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,938<\/td>\n<td>$2,342<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>3,556<\/td>\n<td>$1,551<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>3,742<\/td>\n<td>$3,501<\/td>\n<td>30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,767<\/td>\n<td>$4,185<\/td>\n<td>26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"New-Hampshire\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in New Hampshire<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 148, #25<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $2,456, #49<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 534, #15<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $231, #45<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 742, #29<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 22%, #44<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,194%, #20<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>45<\/td>\n<td>$1,508<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>205<\/td>\n<td>$848<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>239<\/td>\n<td>$1,524<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>309<\/td>\n<td>$3,412<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>366<\/td>\n<td>$2,626<\/td>\n<td>19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>543<\/td>\n<td>$3,172<\/td>\n<td>35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"New-Jersey\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in New Jersey<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 167, #14<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $6,658, #20<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 524, #18<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $320, #17<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 883, #8<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 35%, #12<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,140%, #21<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>584<\/td>\n<td>$1,453<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,523<\/td>\n<td>$3,145<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,973<\/td>\n<td>$5,034<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,984<\/td>\n<td>$5,909<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>3,497<\/td>\n<td>$5,756<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,671<\/td>\n<td>$10,298<\/td>\n<td>28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"New-Mexico\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in New Mexico<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 163, #16<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $6,975, #17<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 562, #12<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $420, #2<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 758, #27<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 42%, #7<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 519%, #35<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>100<\/td>\n<td>$1,621<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>287<\/td>\n<td>$901<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>376<\/td>\n<td>$7,067<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>432<\/td>\n<td>$4,251<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>428<\/td>\n<td>$8,336<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>837<\/td>\n<td>$8,516<\/td>\n<td>30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"New-York\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in New York<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 177, #12<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $12,051, #4<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 539, #13<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $306, #19<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 872, #10<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 31%, #20<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,120%, #24<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>957<\/td>\n<td>$5,061<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>4,301<\/td>\n<td>$5,130<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>4,925<\/td>\n<td>$7,123<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>4,020<\/td>\n<td>$14,734<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>4,225<\/td>\n<td>$13,721<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>6,021<\/td>\n<td>$9,187<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"North-Carolina\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in North Carolina<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 117, #43<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,679, #22<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 518, #22<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $285, #30<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 816, #18<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 28%, #33<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 301%, #47<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>435<\/td>\n<td>$727<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,516<\/td>\n<td>$1,519<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,681<\/td>\n<td>$3,666<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,826<\/td>\n<td>$6,474<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,892<\/td>\n<td>$6,191<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,472<\/td>\n<td>$11,268<\/td>\n<td>40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"North-Dakota\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in North Dakota<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 100, #49<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $33,954, #1<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 348, #50<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $381, #9<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 460, #50<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 29%, #28<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 3,026%, #11<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>19<\/td>\n<td>$14,957<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>85<\/td>\n<td>$1,518<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>127<\/td>\n<td>$4,519<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>125<\/td>\n<td>$169,784<\/td>\n<td>82%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>139<\/td>\n<td>$4,142<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>104<\/td>\n<td>$9,700<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Ohio\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Ohio<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 115, #44<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $12,680, #3<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 498, #28<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $230, #46<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 760, #26<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 25%, #39<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,198%, #19<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>378<\/td>\n<td>$1,286<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,347<\/td>\n<td>$2,581<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,883<\/td>\n<td>$4,049<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>2,185<\/td>\n<td>$3,681<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,843<\/td>\n<td>$61,079<\/td>\n<td>66%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,711<\/td>\n<td>$7,078<\/td>\n<td>11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Oklahoma\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Oklahoma<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 121, #40<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,336, #37<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 410, #45<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $269, #35<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 600, #48<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 25%, #40<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,624%, #15<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>164<\/td>\n<td>$510<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>537<\/td>\n<td>$1,735<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>822<\/td>\n<td>$2,192<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>833<\/td>\n<td>$3,703<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>749<\/td>\n<td>$6,758<\/td>\n<td>24%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>897<\/td>\n<td>$8,487<\/td>\n<td>37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Oregon\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Oregon<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 162, #17<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,631, #23<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 615, #7<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $300, #20<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 815, #19<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 20%, #46<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 572%, #31<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>236<\/td>\n<td>$20,842<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>629<\/td>\n<td>$1,867<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>976<\/td>\n<td>$1,461<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>982<\/td>\n<td>$6,200<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>970<\/td>\n<td>$4,942<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,775<\/td>\n<td>$7,221<\/td>\n<td>33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Pennsylvania\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Pennsylvania<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 146, #26<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,822, #21<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 538, #14<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $261, #37<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 869, #11<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 31%, #19<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 539%, #32<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>472<\/td>\n<td>$2,998<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,859<\/td>\n<td>$2,636<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>2,377<\/td>\n<td>$4,138<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>3,436<\/td>\n<td>$5,513<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>2,557<\/td>\n<td>$6,992<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>3,543<\/td>\n<td>$6,586<\/td>\n<td>22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Rhode-Island\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Rhode Island<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 158, #20<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,573, #35<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 490, #33<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $229, #47<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 755, #28<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 33%, #17<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 16,129%, #2<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>45<\/td>\n<td>$8,479<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>181<\/td>\n<td>$813<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>245<\/td>\n<td>$1,546<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>251<\/td>\n<td>$3,792<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>260<\/td>\n<td>$9,602<\/td>\n<td>33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>323<\/td>\n<td>$8,647<\/td>\n<td>36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"South-Carolina\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in South Carolina<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 114, #45<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,313, #38<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 515, #24<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $294, #28<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 851, #15<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 35%, #11<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 344%, #44<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>183<\/td>\n<td>$854<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>741<\/td>\n<td>$2,802<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>817<\/td>\n<td>$2,670<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>843<\/td>\n<td>$4,491<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>957<\/td>\n<td>$3,950<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,350<\/td>\n<td>$7,398<\/td>\n<td>40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"South-Dakota\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in South Dakota<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 88, #50<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,129, #42<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 338, #51<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $252, #38<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 459, #51<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 29%, #27<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 277%, #48<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>28<\/td>\n<td>$1,283<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>102<\/td>\n<td>$2,864<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>104<\/td>\n<td>$2,894<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>93<\/td>\n<td>$4,901<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>142<\/td>\n<td>$3,002<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>169<\/td>\n<td>$8,266<\/td>\n<td>44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Tennessee\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Tennessee<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 125, #36<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,713, #34<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 522, #20<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $270, #34<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 866, #13<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 29%, #30<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 252%, #49<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>222<\/td>\n<td>$1,516<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,010<\/td>\n<td>$1,738<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>1,116<\/td>\n<td>$2,847<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,218<\/td>\n<td>$3,084<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>1,717<\/td>\n<td>$6,326<\/td>\n<td>27%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,881<\/td>\n<td>$5,766<\/td>\n<td>27%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Texas\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Texas<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 133, #31<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $8,115, #11<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 469, #37<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $350, #13<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 822, #17<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 34%, #13<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 828%, #27<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>1,327<\/td>\n<td>$4,191<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>4,645<\/td>\n<td>$3,510<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>5,947<\/td>\n<td>$10,283<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>6,643<\/td>\n<td>$7,965<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>5,021<\/td>\n<td>$12,348<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>6,342<\/td>\n<td>$11,000<\/td>\n<td>22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Utah\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Utah<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 154, #23<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $9,564, #5<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 492, #32<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $322, #16<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 707, #34<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 42%, #5<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 362%, #43<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>279<\/td>\n<td>$1,976<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>735<\/td>\n<td>$1,774<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>737<\/td>\n<td>$5,346<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>771<\/td>\n<td>$7,182<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>609<\/td>\n<td>$10,236<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>893<\/td>\n<td>$26,487<\/td>\n<td>50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Vermont\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Vermont<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 137, #30<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,878, #32<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 528, #16<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $298, #25<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 696, #36<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 50%, #3<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,617%, #16<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>20<\/td>\n<td>$323<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>90<\/td>\n<td>$875<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>103<\/td>\n<td>$1,159<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>117<\/td>\n<td>$2,331<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>136<\/td>\n<td>$5,856<\/td>\n<td>19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>235<\/td>\n<td>$6,935<\/td>\n<td>39%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Virginia\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Virginia<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 161, #18<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $7,383, #13<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 620, #6<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $340, #14<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 928, #7<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 44%, #4<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 394%, #42<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>477<\/td>\n<td>$3,442<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,559<\/td>\n<td>$8,472<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>2,003<\/td>\n<td>$3,536<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>1,996<\/td>\n<td>$8,493<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>2,092<\/td>\n<td>$7,795<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>2,779<\/td>\n<td>$8,937<\/td>\n<td>24%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Washington\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Washington<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 226, #8<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,109, #31<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 622, #5<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $400, #4<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 857, #14<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 31%, #18<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 8,729%, #5<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>444<\/td>\n<td>$2,041<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>1,523<\/td>\n<td>$2,241<\/td>\n<td>4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>2,120<\/td>\n<td>$3,642<\/td>\n<td>9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>2,193<\/td>\n<td>$7,012<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>2,271<\/td>\n<td>$6,034<\/td>\n<td>16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>3,301<\/td>\n<td>$8,041<\/td>\n<td>30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"West-Virginia\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in West Virginia<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 106, #48<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $2,536, #48<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 472, #36<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $205, #51<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 667, #40<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 15%, #50<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,241%, #17<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>55<\/td>\n<td>$3,965<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>213<\/td>\n<td>$1,538<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>276<\/td>\n<td>$1,200<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>288<\/td>\n<td>$2,114<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>290<\/td>\n<td>$3,581<\/td>\n<td>22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>403<\/td>\n<td>$3,680<\/td>\n<td>31%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Wisconsin\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Wisconsin<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 143, #27<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $4,343, #36<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 494, #30<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $249, #42<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 674, #38<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 29%, #25<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 933%, #25<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>291<\/td>\n<td>$2,895<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>722<\/td>\n<td>$1,441<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>935<\/td>\n<td>$2,786<\/td>\n<td>7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>995<\/td>\n<td>$6,137<\/td>\n<td>17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>2,544<\/td>\n<td>$2,040<\/td>\n<td>14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>1,226<\/td>\n<td>$8,342<\/td>\n<td>28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"Wyoming\" class=\"state\">\n<p><strong>Cybercrime in Wyoming<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Cybercrime victims per 100,000 population (2020): 158, #22<\/li>\n<li>Average cybercrime loss per victim (2020): $5,582, #24<\/li>\n<li>Fraud reports per 100,000 people (2020): 455, #42<\/li>\n<li>Median fraud loss (2020): $312, #18<\/li>\n<li>ID theft per 100,000 people (2020): 619, #46<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in fraud reports, 2019-2020: 34%, #15<\/li>\n<li>Percentage change in government benefit ID theft, 2019-2020: 1,136%, #22<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Cybercrime victims and losses by age group<\/em><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Age group<\/th>\n<th>Victims<\/th>\n<th>Average loss<\/th>\n<th>% of all losses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&lt;20<\/td>\n<td>21<\/td>\n<td>$2,626<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>20-29<\/td>\n<td>91<\/td>\n<td>$1,816<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30-39<\/td>\n<td>120<\/td>\n<td>$1,190<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>40-49<\/td>\n<td>144<\/td>\n<td>$6,954<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>50-59<\/td>\n<td>139<\/td>\n<td>$2,869<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>60+<\/td>\n<td>174<\/td>\n<td>$17,847<\/td>\n<td>61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h2><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28977 size-full\" title=\"deadly file icon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7868.png\" alt=\"deadly file icon\" width=\"130\" height=\"119\" \/> Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>If you lock the doors and windows of your house but <a href=\"\/identity-theft\/protection\/\">leave your digital presence unguarded<\/a>, you really aren\u2019t taking your security all that seriously. With cybercrime, ID theft, and fraud of many types rising even before the pandemic, these statistics should serve as a wake-up call to be more cautious with your online and digital presence.<\/p>\n<h2><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28965 size-full\" title=\"data icon\" src=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Group-7869.png\" alt=\"data icon\" width=\"130\" height=\"119\" \/> About This Data<\/h2>\n<p>The FBI\u2019s IC3 branch reports annual cybercrime statistics, and we consulted 2020 as well as several previous years. You can find the most recent data <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ic3.gov\/Media\/PDF\/AnnualReport\/2020_IC3Report.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>FTC\u2019s Consumer Sentinel Network data comes from a variety of sources, including fraud hotlines and websites the FTC maintains, other federal agencies, including the FBI and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), private entities like Microsoft and the Better Business Bureau (BBB), and state law enforcement agencies.<\/p>\n<p>About 59 percent of the reports included in the 2020 installment came from FTC-maintained systems, the BBB accounted for about 16 percent, and the CFPB added about 11 percent. The other organizations accounted for a combined 14 percent.<\/p>\n<p>You can access the most recent report <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/system\/files\/documents\/reports\/consumer-sentinel-network-data-book-2020\/csn_annual_data_book_2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>, and explore the agency\u2019s data dashboard <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/reports\/consumer-sentinel-network-data-book-2020\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":29046,"template":"views\/lp\/lp-2021.blade.php","class_list":["post-28961","resources","type-resources","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America | Security.org<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Cybercrime surged 69% in 2020, with losses over $4 billion. Identity theft, especially related to government benefits, skyrocketed nearly 3,000%.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America | Security.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Cybercrime surged 69% in 2020, with losses over $4 billion. Identity theft, especially related to government benefits, skyrocketed nearly 3,000%.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Security.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dotorgresearch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-25T18:07:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1968\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"676\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@securitydotorg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"33 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/\",\"name\":\"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America | Security.org\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-28T04:10:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-25T18:07:30+00:00\",\"description\":\"Cybercrime surged 69% in 2020, with losses over $4 billion. Identity theft, especially related to government benefits, skyrocketed nearly 3,000%.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png\",\"width\":1968,\"height\":676,\"caption\":\"State By State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Resources\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/resources\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/\",\"name\":\"Security.org\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Security.org\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/04\/security-org-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/04\/security-org-logo.png\",\"width\":329,\"height\":59,\"caption\":\"Security.org\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dotorgresearch\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/securitydotorg\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/securitydotorg\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/SecurityDotOrg\/\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America | Security.org","description":"Cybercrime surged 69% in 2020, with losses over $4 billion. Identity theft, especially related to government benefits, skyrocketed nearly 3,000%.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America | Security.org","og_description":"Cybercrime surged 69% in 2020, with losses over $4 billion. Identity theft, especially related to government benefits, skyrocketed nearly 3,000%.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/","og_site_name":"Security.org","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dotorgresearch","article_modified_time":"2024-09-25T18:07:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1968,"height":676,"url":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@securitydotorg","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"33 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/","url":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/","name":"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America | Security.org","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png","datePublished":"2021-06-28T04:10:05+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-25T18:07:30+00:00","description":"Cybercrime surged 69% in 2020, with losses over $4 billion. Identity theft, especially related to government benefits, skyrocketed nearly 3,000%.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Screen-Shot-2021-06-23-at-9.02.08-PM.png","width":1968,"height":676,"caption":"State By State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/digital-safety\/annual-cybercrime-report\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Resources","item":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/resources\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"State-by-State Breakdown of Cybercrime in America"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/","name":"Security.org","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#organization","name":"Security.org","url":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/04\/security-org-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/app\/uploads\/2021\/04\/security-org-logo.png","width":329,"height":59,"caption":"Security.org"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dotorgresearch","https:\/\/x.com\/securitydotorg","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/securitydotorg","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/SecurityDotOrg\/"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resources\/28961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/resources"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/resources"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.security.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}